Peer Review Proces

JURNAL SINTIKA (Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Teknik Informatika, dan Sistem Komputer) is committed to maintaining high standards of academic quality, integrity, and transparency. All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review process to ensure originality, scientific merit, methodological soundness, and relevance to the journal's scope.

Review Process

1. Initial Editorial Screening

After submission, the Editorial Office performs an initial evaluation to determine whether the manuscript:

• Fits the journal's Focus and Scope.
• Complies with the Author Guidelines and manuscript formatting requirements.
• Meets the minimum standards of academic writing.
• Passes a plagiarism screening using similarity detection software.

Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected before entering the peer-review stage.

---

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

Eligible manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.

The journal applies a Double-Blind Peer Review system, meaning that:

• The identities of the authors are concealed from the reviewers.
• The identities of the reviewers are concealed from the authors.

This process ensures an objective, fair, and unbiased evaluation.

---

3. Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

• Originality and novelty of the research.
• Relevance to the journal's scope.
• Scientific significance and contribution.
• Research methodology and data analysis.
• Clarity of presentation and organization.
• Quality of references and literature review.
• Validity of conclusions.

Reviewers provide constructive comments and recommendations to improve the manuscript.

---

4. Editorial Decision

Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the Editor-in-Chief may decide to:

• Accept Submission
• Minor Revisions Required
• Major Revisions Required
• Resubmit for Review
• Decline Submission

The final publication decision rests solely with the Editorial Board.

---

5. Revision Process

Authors receiving revision requests are expected to:

• Revise the manuscript according to the reviewers' comments.
• Submit a revised manuscript within the specified deadline.
• Provide a detailed response explaining how each reviewer comment has been addressed.

Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.

---

6. Final Acceptance

Once the manuscript satisfies all scientific and editorial requirements, it is formally accepted for publication and proceeds to:

• Copyediting
• Layout Editing
• Proofreading
• Online Publication

---

Publication Ethics

JURNAL SINTIKA follows the ethical standards established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Editors, reviewers, and authors are expected to uphold the principles of:

• Academic integrity
• Confidentiality
• Objectivity
• Transparency
• Fairness
• Avoidance of conflicts of interest

Any indication of plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabricated data, or unethical research practices will result in rejection or retraction of the manuscript.

---

Estimated Review Time

The overall review and publication process generally takes 4–8 weeks, depending on the quality of the submitted manuscript and the timeliness of the review and revision process.

---

JURNAL SINTIKA is committed to providing a fair, transparent, timely, and high-quality peer-review process to ensure the publication of original and impactful research in the fields of Information Systems, Informatics Engineering, and Computer Systems.